/

Please enter your feedback

Close

Thank You For Registering

We sent an official communication to your email address provided during your registration. Please check your email and follow the instructions.

You must be logged-in to do that!

Close
Close
Comments
  • Print
  • Bookmark + Share

The World's Ugliest Buildings

1 of 15

In downtown Portland, OR, stands an imposing 15-story edifice that’s one of the most hated buildings in America. The façade is an off-putting hodgepodge of faux classical columns, strange and useless decorative elements, and penitentiary-like small windows, with a depressing color scheme (throwing in some tacky blue glass for good measure). “It’s all gaudy imagery with no tie to the location,” says Jason Fifield, an associate at Ankrom Moisan Architects in Portland. The interior isn’t much better—it’s been described as dark and claustrophobic.

Designed by famed architect Michael Graves, the Portland Building is an icon (for better or worse—mainly worse) of postmodernism, which was a major design trend in the 1980s, when the structure went up, but has since fallen from favor. And that’s a primary reason there’s not much enthusiasm for anything erected in that decade.

But these aren’t the only buildings that spur resentment, and even rage, in those who set eyes on them. Professional and amateur critics alike disparage structures from many eras and in many countries. Of course, different people have different criteria for what makes a structure unappealing. “The ugliest buildings are the anonymous ones,” says Christopher Bonanos, who edits architecture criticism at New York magazine. “Even if an experimental, high-profile building doesn’t quite deliver, at least the architect is trying something. A boring building is a warehouse in the middle of New Jersey.”

For Jason Fifield, what makes a building ugly “is when the design isn’t generated by real reasons but rather by arbitrariness, just for the sake of creating an image.”

To compile our list of the world’s ugliest structures, we consulted with architects and design experts as well as the general public. Pretty much everybody had something to say. For instance, there aren’t many admirers of the spherical houses on long pole “stems” planted, like so many mushrooms, in the Netherlands. (The architect was given free rein courtesy of a Dutch subsidy for experimental housing.) Then there’s the midwestern corporate headquarters that takes the form of a huge picnic basket. Sure, it’s funny from the outside, but probably not for the employees of Longaberger, in Newark, OH, who have to go work in a hamper every day.

Many designs around the world inspire love and hate in equal measure. A prime example would be the glass-and-metal pyramid I. M. Pei designed as a new entrance for the Louvre Museum in the 1990s. “Your pyramid is magnificent,” protagonist Robert Langdon tells a Parisian official in The Da Vinci Code. “A scar on the face of Paris,” the man retorts.

The jury is still out on this kind of building. And to be sure, sometimes a design that’s disdained and misunderstood in its infancy eventually becomes a loved and admired attraction. “In 1959, the Guggenheim honestly looked like it had fallen in from Mars,” points out Bonanos. “Of course, now New Yorkers love it.”

Still, we doubt that any of the buildings on our list will find favor anytime soon.

1 of 15

Comments (82)

Open / Close
Please note: Your comment will not appear immediately.

  • Ascent at Roebling's Bridge in Covington Kentucky

    Ascent at Roebling's Bridge in Covington Kentucky should rank high on this list. It takes away from the great view coming into the Cincinnati area from the south heading north. Bad, bad choice in architechure style if you can call it that.
    Longaberger on the other hand is quite unique and has a very clever design.

  • RE: Ascent at Roebling's Bridge in Covington Kentucky
  • The Peru Obelisk thingy

    Hey, Waydahminnut !!! Isn't this one of those things in Sudan spotted from that spy satellite in "FlashForward " ?!?!!

  • RE: The Peru Obelisk thingy
  • The purple on the EMP

    is for "Purple Haze," duh! I think the EMP is fun to look at, particularly in the drab area around the Space Needle, and it contains the Scifi Museum, which is a plus. It's much better looking than the surrounding hideous high rise condos Greg Nickles sold the land to. It used to be cool how one could see the Space Needle unimpeded from all directions, yet now those condos blot out the sky, and will be on a similar "most hideous" list in a short amount of time.

  • RE: The purple on the EMP
  • Longaberger Home Office

    Bunny needs an eye exam, this building is unique, bold and beautiful. To compare Longaberger to Crate and Barrel is obscene and lacks understanding of the topic she is trying to write about. Head back to the hutch and find a new topic! This article is "hare-brained"!

    • rjm0314 — Posted Nov. 23, 2009

      I agree...this article is full of it!! The Basket is very unique and imaginative. These people who conducted this "study" need to look at what's really ugly. How about Walmarts and the thousands of stark ugly strip malls that create the eyesores on this planet.

    • RE: Longaberger Home Office
  • RE: Longaberger Home Office
  • glad to see

    glad to see that I am not the only one that finds most of these buildings interesting rather than ugly. Bunny must be one boring person if she thinks these buildings are ugly.
    I am also disappointed that Federation Square in Melbourne Australia didn't get a mention... has to be the biggest eyesore I have ever seen.

  • RE: glad to see
  • This comment was deleted by the moderator.

  • RE: WOW! Bunny Wrong more like it.
  • In the eye of the beholder

    I must disagree with the author. What I see is amazing creativity and vision. People coloring outside the lines. There were an couple of locations that were very odd, but overall I would enjoy seeing these structures in person & up close. But ugly??? Not.

  • RE: In the eye of the beholder
  • Is Bunny "usually" Wong?

    This article must have been a ploy to get folks to comment by T&L because most of these buildings are quite creative. While some are unusual, only a few would qualify as ugly and that would be "MY" opinion. If T&L was hoping to gain subscribers with this strategy I think they are way off base. I'd be more likely to watch Fox News and I'm guessing Bunny and her editor are big fans. What a waste of bandwidth!

  • RE: Is Bunny "usually" Wong?
  • The Worlds Ugliest Article

    Snarky, uninformed and, mostly, waaaay off base. Nice work, Bunny.

    • backyardscut — Posted Nov. 16, 2009

      Don't you know art when you see it? I love it !!! When I draw I go deep into myself because I want every part or some parts of me to shine in my work. I'm not an artist just a loving house wife. I do wish that I have worked toward what I love so much and that is art , drawing , painting. UGLY IS BEAUTIFUL !!!

    • RE: The Worlds Ugliest Article
  • RE: The Worlds Ugliest Article
  • Is Gehry a dirty old man?

    The Gehry building looks like some kind of matronly upskirt pose.

  • RE: Is Gehry a dirty old man?

What's your favorite thing to do during an airport layover?

  • Browse duty-free
  • Read gossip mags
  • Grab a bite
  • Take a nap
  • Catch up on email
  • Listen to my iPod

Advertisement
Advertisement

Marketplace